SMWS 4-22

It’s finally over! Instead of posting my original SMWS I just thought I’d write up a little reflection of the school year. The way that we went back and took a focused look at social media this semester was pretty interesting. Not just the SMWS assignments, but the essays as well. To be honest, at the beginning of the semester I thought that an English class based off of Facebook was asking too much, but as the semester moved on and we completed more assignments, I eased into the thought and found it actually quite interesting. I think the ideas behind each of the essays were very solid and made you think about the way you use social media. The Facebook in slow motion assignment really gave me a new perspective on not only how people argue, but all the little nuances that are hidden in their arguments as well. The SMWS assignments were helpful as well, although I don’t think they gave as in depth a look as some of the essay assignments. The week where we gave up Facebook was the most rewarding SMWS assignment in my opinion. It was eye opening to see how much I used not only Facebook but twitter as well, and how much of an impact it had on me. The fact that I couldn’t give it up for a full week was actually kind of sad… but at least it gave me motivation to use it less often. All in all it was a very good course and I’m glad I got to finish it.

SMWS 3-31

It was honestly really difficult to go a full week without Facebook. Im sure I couldn’t give up all online activity for good, let alone just a week. I gave up just facebook because I figured I don’t use it so much and it would be easier to let go of than youtube or twitter, but it turned out to be much more difficult than I thought. I deleted the facebook app on my phone to make it easier on myself, but it didn’t really help. Even without the app on my homescreen I found myself going online to check it almost every day. Also the fact that I got email notifications with every interaction made it difficult for me to stay separated from it for too long. It’s interesting: when I have facebook available to me I barely check it… I usually go on once a week when it was available to me. But with the app gone and the challenge of not using it for a week in front of me, it just didn’t work out. The first couple of days I took a peek here or there just because it felt like I needed to. Midway through the week I didn’t check as much… only if I had got notifications or anything, just to see what was going on. During the weekend I was able to go without it, even when I had notifications. I think since I was so used to using it, it became habit just to check it. If I had to keep this up for a while I’m sure I could go without it. I just thought it was really interesting to see how big a part Facebook played in my daily routine, and how hard it was to give it up for a week.

SMWS 3-18

I think it’s interesting to see the huge following these new social media sites gain when they first start up. Even going back to the early days Facebook, it was a huge deal. It was supposed to be the “MySpace killer” and apparently it was. Now there’s a new wave of sites that have sprung up, and I’m having trouble finding the point of them. Twitter, the 140 character or less Facebook, sucked me in, only because of its quick and to the point format. I like it because it’s like a more compact version of Facebook, and it’s much easier to get news about sports, music, and pretty much everything.

The main new site I’m referring to is Instagram, a Facebook just for pictures. Instagram has a pretty big following now, but Im still content with twitter and Facebook. Personally I don’t take many pictures, and the pictures I do take always seem awkward to me so I don’t see the point of using Instagram. There’s the occasional gem of a picture that I’ll see, but I’ve never seen anything that fully convinced me to join the Instagram population.

Now there’s an even more pointless website that is basically Instagram with videos. Vine lets you create a compilation of short clips that totals to less than 10 seconds. The reason I don’t really like vine is because it really is pointless. A lot of the videos are random or people trying to be funny when they really aren’t. Im not trying to sound super mean, but honestly Vine is another site I don’t see myself using in the near future. I don’t see the point of these websites but hey, I guess you can’t knock it till you try it…

SMWS 3-4

Over the weekend news spread quickly of a baby girl that was apparently cured of HIV. The infant girl was born HIV positive, and over the course of 2 years it turns out she was cured. This is a rare case, as infants in the US usually aren’t born with HIV because of all the testing done before the birth. However, doctors were unaware this mother was HIV positive until she was undergoing labor, and as a result the little girl was born with HIV as well. The baby was put on anti-retroviral treatment at 18 months, and after 5 months of treatment she was cured. While the story is crazy and interesting in itself, I found it interesting the way it was spread around. I initially found the story on Twitter, when someone was making a joke about the child being Magic Johnsons daughter. Ironically enough this is how I learn about some of the big news stories now. Someone will make a joke or mention something on Facebook or Twitter and it’ll make its way to my newsfeed. Because of the trending topics on twitter, I think the story got a lot of publicity and shot up to be a lot more prominent. As a matter of fact as I was writing this, my friend commented about seeing the story on Facebook. It’s amazing how stories can spread around so fast on the internet now. This could be a monumental medical breakthrough, and the fact that it is being spread around like this can only be good. Hopefully doctors can build off this and cure more cases of HIV.

SMWS 2-25

Over the weekend the NFL combine began, and the results ended up all over my social media. For those that don’t know, the Combine is an event where college football players that are making the transition to the NFL go to compete. There are a number of exercises that each athlete must perform based on their position, like the 40 yard dash and bench press. On Facebook I liked the combine’s page, so I got constant updates on what was going on. My twitter timeline exploded with news about the combine results. Having played football in high school, it’s hard not to get excited about anything relating to college ball or the NFL. Everyone seemed to be freaking out about linemen that were running extremely fast 40 times, and skill players that were running even faster. What I found interesting was that I heard and learned more about players on the internet than I did actually watching the combine on TV. On the internet, it seemed like each player that did something great got their own story about their rough upbringing or an injury they had to overcome to make it that far. It made the actual combine seem so one dimensional. I think this is a pretty cool concept. I think that in the future internet will become more prominent than TV, and I feel the combine is the perfect example. The fact that social media sites like Facebook and twitter were that invested in something like the combine shows the shift that is beginning to happen.

                            

SMWS 1-28

Facebook really isn’t my thing anymore… I read through my timeline occasionally, but I rarely post anything… For some reason it’s been losing its appeal to me. Back in high school, it was a much closer experience. Everyone from school would post and like each other’s things nearly every day. Near the end of the school year pictures and posts about prom, graduation, and summer dominated my feed. I wouldn’t say I was addicted, but I remember using Facebook A LOT back then. But once summer actually came, the fire slowly died down. Everyone still posted, but there wasn’t the same feeling.

Besides the fact that it didn’t feel the same, summer was the time that my aunts and uncles REALLY started using Facebook, and they acted like typical family members on any social media website. They commented on every post, posted random things on my wall, and told my parents about every little thing I did on Facebook. I didn’t really mind it, but this changed the way I looked at Facebook as well. Once the first semester of freshman year came around, I really didn’t mess with Facebook anymore… I had switched over to twitter.

Now I would say I use both equally, although not very frequently. I use twitter mostly to keep up with current events and the new friends I’ve made. I use Facebook to keep in touch with the people back home, and my friends that went off for college. It’s interesting to go on there and see how much people have changed and what people are accomplishing. 

SMWS 1/23

This week was the championship for both the AFC and NFC divisions of the NFL, which also means the 2^nd most intense week of trash talking in America. The San Francisco 49ers played the Atlanta Falcons and the Ravens played the New England Patriots, with the 49ers and Ravens coming out on top. With each of these teams being in distinct areas of the country, fans turn out to be super passionate… and that passion is always transferred to social media. I think it’s hilarious that people can get so upset or so happy about sports that it ruins relationships and lives. The pride associated with sports teams is crazy. I remember reading a story this weekend where a 49ers fan that travelled to Atlanta for the game, ended up stabbing a Falcons fan in the neck after the game.  Me being from San Francisco I have to support the 49ers, but I never voice my opinions online, because I know it’ll cause a riot. The problem with sports and social media is that people want to have teams all to themselves. If you start to support a team around this time of year people consider you a bandwagon fan. If you cheer for another team people think you hate their team for no reason. On Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or pretty much any social media site you can just feel the taunts being thrown around at each other. Normal and famous people alike show their support for their teams. I think it’s awesome that football can create such passionate fans, but I hate how big of an impact trash talk has on social media.

Extended Reflection: World Fair's Influence on America

In what ways does the Chicago World's Fair of 1893 change America? What lasting inventions and ideas did it introduce into American culture? What important figures were critically influenced by the Fair?

The influence that the Chicago World’s Fair may not seem great at surface value, based on the fact that many Americans remain oblivious to the grand event held in 1893. However, it impacted America far more than first perceived. The World’s Fair changed America’s view of the world, and vice versa. This was America’s attempt to show the world it had the potential to be a leading power. The many exotic, fascinating, and exciting events and exhibits at the fair introduced Americans to the many different cultures of the world.

 The construction of the fair was a huge obstacle and the way it was overcome was quite amazing for the time. The wood frames of the buildings were put up first, and then in an effort to save time, they were spray painted. No longer did individuals have to paint with brushes. This quick and easy way of using hoses to spray the paint onto the building surfaces quickened the painting process. Francis Millet was credited with this new technique of painting, and in the end, his “spray painting” idea was a huge part of getting the fair up and running on time. Another huge part of the pre-fair process was the electricity. Upon further investigation I found that Nikola Tesla, the Serbian inventor/mechanical engineer, along with the Westinghouse Company was picked to power the fair, over American inventor Thomas Edison. Tesla’s cost of powering the fair came at a much cheaper price than Edison’s. Edison, mad at losing the deal, did not allow Westinghouse or Tesla to use his bulbs. Instead Westinghouse came up with their own bulbs that were more efficient than Edison’s. The Chicago World’s Fair ended up being the brightest event on earth in 1893, thanks to Tesla and the Westinghouse Co.  This “electricity race” if you will, led to a brighter future for America, as electrically powered light bulbs became a strong contender for household lighting. Phosphorescent bulbs came about as a result of Tesla’s involvement in the lighting of the fair. A few other notable inventions came about in the forms of food. Cracker Jacks were first introduced at the fair, along with other traditional modern American foods. Juicy Fruit gum, Quaker Oats, and Shredded Wheat are just a few. Perhaps the most influential and iconic invention at the fair was the Ferris wheel. This engineering marvel was designed to rival the Eiffel tower, and definitely succeeded at this job. It has become an icon at many American fairs, however all those are miniature versions. The original was designed to fit 40 people into each car.

The Fair managed to impact Walt Disney, who drew from the fair’s magnificent scenery to help him design his theme parks. L. Frank Baulm’s Emerald City in the Wizard of Oz was his recreation of the White City. The Fair showed the world the magic of its individual countries and cultures, and discreetly boosted America to a position of power, by stimulating the economy, and gaining the nation some respect.

America's Arrogance?

In describing the collapse of the roof of Manufacturers and Liberal Arts Building, Larson writes "In a great blur of snow and silvery glass the building's roof—that marvel of late nineteenth-century hubris, enclosing the greatest volume of unobstructed space in history—collapsed to the floor below" [p. 196–97]. Was the entire Fair, in its extravagant size and cost, an exhibition of arrogance? Do such creative acts automatically engender a darker, destructive parallel?

America is known for its flashiness and extravagance. We want to be the biggest, fastest, and baddest nation around. One event in history that displays this greater than many others: The Worlds Fair. Set up in Chicago in the short amount of 3 years, this magnificent city showed the tenacity and audacity that America had. It contained glorious buildings like the Manufacturers and Liberal Arts Building, and contained amazing contraptions that had never been seen anywhere in the world before. The Ferris Wheel was America’s way of “Out Eiffelling Eiffell” and shows that the fair was built to maintain the nations pride, rather than solely taunt others arrogantly. However, the fairs denial to implement a cost limit or resource limit shows the real motive behind the fair. This was America’s chance to show the world that it was the greatest nation, and by far. It was not meant to match other countries, it was meant to outdo them.

When something this creative is created then of course it engenders darker parallel. In this case Mr Holmes could be considered that parallel. In the broader scope that seems to be a relevant statement to many things. The United States, with all its intellectual, creative, and athletic potential and ability is matched by its criminal activity. That seemed to be a big theme in the book, where the greatness of the fair is the spotlight, but in the background there was always that criminal presence and history with Holmes. The display put on by America’s extravagant world fair was not solely arrogance, but was also the pride that this nation is known for. Throughout the course of the book, Burnham emphasizes that he wants to do it not only for Chicago, but for the United States as well. The idea of “out Eiffelling Eiffel” sounds like pure arrogance but I believe is a more prideful motive. As a nation that came from nothing, it is amazing that we came to such a prominent role in the late 19^th century. To celebrate such an accomplishment the World Fair was necessary. It was not just a way to celebrate, but a way to prove that America deserved to be one of the leading nations in the world. America still remains the arrogant nation to others and prideful nation to itself, but I believe this is justifiable. Other nations had their world fairs and although they were not as grand as the one held in Chicago, Im guessing they were just as expensive and time consuming. The world we live in is one based on material possessions and physical beauty. In order to fit in, one must appeal to both those criteria. The Worlds fair was simply America’s way of fitting in, whether it was pure arrogance or patriotic pride is determined by one’s point of view.

Evils Imminent Reflection

Extended Reflection Journal (BLOG) : In the note "Evils Imminent," Erik Larson writes "Beneath the gore and smoke and loam, this book is about the evanescence of life, and why some men choose to fill their brief allotment of time engaging the impossible, others in the manufacture of sorrow" [xi]. What does the book reveal about "the ineluctable conflict between good and evil"? What is the essential difference between men like Daniel Burnham and Henry H. Holmes? Are they alike in any way?

Before Larson begins his story, he gives this note about the "evils imminent" during a time like the late 1800s chicago. There are contrasts all throughout the book, and even the title offers its own contrasts in the words it uses. The Devil usually resonates a bad connotation, as he represents evil and sin, while the White City immediately gives the feeling of cleanliness or purity. The book displays conflict between these good and evil contrasts by showcasing the men Daniel Burnham and H H Holmes. Burnham, the good, is focused on “engaging the impossible” and giving everything he has for this Worlds Fair. Throughout the book Burnham faces extremely challenging obstacles as the book progresses through Part 1. He is given the opportunity to create the greatest event in history and he wants to prove that he can handle the responsibility, not just for the U.S., but to prove Chicago is worthy of such an honor. Holmes, the bad, is engaged in the “manufacture of sorrow” and goes on his killing spree by leading his victims to his hotel. Holmes is able to build his own Worlds Fair Hotel, and uses his incredible charm and good looks to manipulate the young women visiting Chicago to view the Worlds Fair. By fending off police and creditors, Holmes was able to go on the first serial killing spree. From the surface it may seem like Holmes is a madman, but his charm and the creepiness of his murders is so engaging it makes you wonder if he really is as evil as he seems. The “ineluctable conflict” here is apparent, as even though these men seem to have nothing to do with each other, they are both connected by their passions. Oddly enough, they are both blue eyed and passionate. Burnham is passionate about architecture, which in the end produces The Worlds Fair, one of the grandest events in history. Holmes passion for killing leads him to create his hotel during this Worlds Fair and manages to pursue his passion discreetly. Even though they never meet formally, the conflict between good and evil is unavoidable. Their fates were intertwined, as shown in the book. However they represent more than just an architect and a murderer. Burnham shows the fight and spirit that America has to always be the best, and by managing to build the fair shows his determination and will, and the will of America as a nation. Holmes shows the contrast to that: the seedy underbelly of America that we are unwilling to confess openly, but we allow to take place anyway. So although they are very different men, they are alike since they both represent aspects of the gilded-age and even modern America, and are both passionate about their work.

Blog 3 Satire

Satire is a literary form used to make fun of certain topics or ideas in the name of a good laugh, and at times for more. When used properly, satiristic Ideas can be seen as almost plausible, but never actually possible. But when used properly, (a smart, sharp piece of work underneath the hood, even if it may have a cartoonish look on the outside with some humor tossed in for good measure) it can be a very effective way for an author to get their point to the reader without having to actually state their point. It is becoming used a lot more in modern day situations than I thought. Ranging from specific cartoon shows to SNL and even some radio stations, the range of satirists in modern times is very broad. Often times the things they poke fun at are just for that- fun. But every once in a while there are the bigger issues that are brought in, and even though they may be controversial, some topics can be very enlightening as well when, viewed in a satirical spotlight. Just to give some examples of modern day satire users in television: The wacky cartoon show Family Guy and its creator Seth McFarlane, the popular TV show Saturday Night Live, the comedic The Colbert Report, the controversial and always hilarious South Park and its creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone and the list goes on and on. But satire is not just showcased in television. There are examples of satire in music, movies, radio, and even video games! I was surprised when I found some of the video games I played were seen as satirical. Here are some examples of the above-mentioned kinds.

Blazing Saddles, the 1974 western movie that satirized racism, Hostel, the dark horror movie that satirizes the darkness of human nature, The Onion News Network, a magazine publication that pokes fun at contemporary themes, the artist “Weird Al” Yankovic whose musical parodies poked fun at the original artists as well as others, and then the video game entitled Fallout 3, which satirized war and post doomsday life.

Now all these examples are good and well, but what do they do? Well when something is satirized, there are a few things the satirists want to do. At certain times the satirists want to show how stupid an idea or concept is, and simply aim to do that. Such is so with the article we read from the onion news article about MagnaSoles. All the claims the inserts were making were obviously untrue, and the onion compared this with modern advertisements to show how dumb they are. That’s all. At other times the satirists try inform the viewer/ listener of a different situation. Such is the case with the TV show SNL. A few weeks ago an episode aired and the popular “Weekend Report with Seth Myers” came up. One of the topics was about the president in Libya. One of the actors came out dressed as the Libyan president and started cracking jokes about how he was killing his people and such. The jokes were funny, but I didn’t realize how bad the situation was. After watching I later looked up the rebellion in Libya to find that a lot is going in there. So intentionally or not, the satirists can often make people realize about local, national, or even global issues. Another situation of the same type, though this may sound corny is the video game Fallout 3. The game is set in the future, but the game world was destroyed in the 1950’s era, leading to many of the historical figures of that time being talked about in game. Things like bomb shelters and president Eisenhower were in the game, and we are just now learning about them in history. So once again, the satirists can educate the viewer on purpose through certain elements.

I believe the example we read in class was a good case in the next reason for satire. To propose new ideas. A Modest Proposal was a very believable piece at first. The way the author presented his idea was legit and logical and made it seem as if he actually had a modest proposal… That is until he actually revealed his idea to eat the babies of the poor population in order to decrease the number of poor children. When I stated the idea, it sounded absolutely absurd! But when the author proposed it he actually had a backing, the actual ways they would do it and such. This was actually a satire of their government, and how it could not control the population, but it was an easy way for him to propose a new idea. The magic of satire is that the humor can throw off and weird thoughts the reader gets whilst reading. I would have immediately stopped reading if the article had been dull and just proposed the ideas with no flare. Another thing we read was a letter written regarding beavers. The beavers had begun to build dams along a river in a mans back yard. These beavers did not bother the man, however the city did not enjoy their habitats. As a response to a city letter the man writes how the beavers have every right to be there and to build. By personifying the animals, he makes a good argument and honestly makes the city look wrong. This example was particularly good because of his use of the word “dam” in almost every dam sentence. The end result was a clever letter that showed us what satire really is. The end result of all satire however is humor. Though all may not bring new light to a situation, they all can make you laugh, whether it is out loud or a little mental chuckle. But those satirists who can make you laugh and inform you are special. The ones like SNL and the onion present ideas and issues and can make you learn while also laughing.

BLOG 2 (Hemingway's Heroic Code)

In order to examine how Romero displays the qualities defined in Hemingway’s code of ethics, we must first return to Romero’s introduction into the story. Romero is described as a handsome, dignified young man, who is an exceptional bullfighter. He “saved his bulls for the last when he wanted them, smoothly worn down” and “always worked to the bull”. He is able to work with his bulls at a very close distance, wearing them down until he feels like ending the fight. This description of Romero’s type of bullfighting reinforces Hemingway’s code, by showing how Romero handles himself assuredly and confronts the danger head-on. Bullfighting is an unpredictable… “hobby” and many find themselves standing far from the bull and taunting it then pulling away at the last second. However, Romero exhibits his physical prowess, and mental toughness by working closely with each bull he fights.

One thing that is noteworthy about Romero’s role in the story, is how he is juxtaposed with the other men in the book, mainly Jake, making his qualities seem much better. He is introduced considerably late in the story, allowing time for the men such as Robert, Jake, and Mike to show their true colors, and how “weak” they really are as male characters. Hemingway’s hero would be some one who handles himself surely and faces his problems head on. With Robert, Mike, and Jake, it is obvious they cant handle themselves surely, especially since they are all drinking so much. Also Jake cant really face his troubling situation with Brett head on so instead he just rolls with the punches and lets her control him. It is easy to see how contrasted Romero is to the other male characters in the book. One interesting thing I noticed was how the only way Romero displays Hemingway’s hero code, is in the bullfighting ring. When outside of the ring he is still seen as handsome and dignified, but I don’t feel as though he emulates the same characteristics he does when inside the ring.

So how does Romero display the qualities of a hero? Basically by the way he presents himself and moreover, the way he fights in the ring. I think that if Romero was introduced as someone other than a bullfighter he would not have the same impact. The bullfighting is the way Hemingway portrays him as a hero.

As for modern day heroes, there are quite a few people and professions that fit Hemingway’s description. Personally I believe that a hero is brave/courageous and doesn’t necessarily exhibit grace under pressure, but is able to handle pressure and can take a challenge. The classic examples of firefighters and the police force are great for this description. Both firefighters and police officers go to work unsure of what is going to happen, and sometimes they end up in very stressful situations. It is these situations that separate these courageous people from ordinary citizens. Firefighters must display their grace under pressure to get rid of the fires that they fight each day. If they were ungraceful, there is a risk that the fire might spread. Police do the same with the criminals they face. If they did not exhibit grace under pressure, they run the risk of letting criminals go free.

If looking at Hemingway’s description in a wider lens, you may notice there are more heroes than you realized. Politicians, Teachers, Zookeepers, Soldiers, and many more could be considered heroes based on Hemingway’s description. While the latter is automatically assumed to be heroes, since they die for their country, the other three may seem a little random. However the way I see it, each of those professions face difficult situations, and in order to perform their jobs correctly, the must “display grace under pressure” and they all handle themselves assuredly while facing their “dangers” head on. In my opinion Hemingway’s description of a hero is sort of hit or miss for modern heroes, but it is easy to see how Romero displays the characteristics in his section of The Sun Also Rises.

Reflection on The Execution of Tropman

Is it really necessary for ruthless criminals to be sentenced to execution? There are many viewpoints on this topic, but in the execution of tropman, by Ivan Turgenev, it is seen as an unnecessary and even barbaric act. In mr. Turgenevs essay about a convicted mans execution, it is easy to see how he feels about the situation. The way he describes the whole night easily makes the reader want to take up his side of the argument. He is reluctant to even go to the execution at first, and I thought it was interesting how he kept feeling the burden of guilt come up throughout the execution process.

He presents the situation in a somewhat subjective tone, but for the most part his examinations were correct. The crowd was getting hyped for no reason. Turgenev is able to show how simple the humanPsyche becomes when there is a chance to see something that is a rare opportunity. Many people came to this execution, but only the front few could even see... I thought this was an interesting point because so often humans will do un natural things to say they were part of something big. Turgenevs inclusion of this analysis greatly helps his critique against capital punishment.

However his subjective tone does take away from his argument in the long run. He keeps talking about the cons of the execution and how barbaric everyone acts just to be there, but not once mentions the pros of the execution. This may be because tropman was young and perhaps innocent, but every essay needs to look at the counter argument and try to acknowledge it.This essay is talking about an execution a long time ago, making me feel that it's analyzations are not necessarily true about people in modern times. Nowadays the criminals on death row are put to execution for much worse crimes, but they are not a public event. I believe the only fuel Turgenev had for his argument was the fact that the crowd acted so differently than normal humans would. If the people had gathered respectfully and watched the execution quietly take place, this would be a totally different story.

I remember last year we had a debate on whether capital punishment was justified or not, and my view on the topic was picked for me. Now that I can choose for myself, I realize how hard of a decision it is. There are people that deserve to be executed, but we as humans do not have the right to simply take another life. Like ghandi said "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." I think that simply because of the way he describes the event, I am going to side with Turgenev on this argument. Capital punishment is one injustice that should not exist.

Movies! (Blog 12)

Great movies consist of a few key elements. They all have memorable characters and an engaging story. The cream of the crop can stand the test of time, and often are influential to a generation. Favorite movies can vary, but usually all of them meet the above mentioned criteria. Some of my favorites are:

-inception
-Avatar
-The Dark Knight
-Shutter island
-Star wars

Metacognitive Q's on definition essay

Culminating Writers Profile
1. I feel I am expecting more from myself now that I have seen how to write proper essays. All the info is there for me, now I just need to start writing better.
2. I want to say my strengths are writing opening paragraphs and giving good anecdotes. I try to give a good sized opener to set the tone of the essay, then give good stories to enforce that feeling.
3. Concluding is definitely my weakness. I've tried to start giving a broader perspective to strengthen the conclusion but I still feel my conclusions are weak.

Evaluating your writing process
1. I'd definitely go back to the king herod story!
2. My peers said I had not very many examples of fear, so when I went back I found it simple to find a couple examples, personally and in general.
3. I had trouble, as always, with my conclusion. I couldn't find the right way to bring the whole essay together so it may have seemed a little loose.

Evaluating your writing process
1. The adding of the king herd story was the easiest. I was told to add a few examples of fear and that immediately sprung into my mind.
2. I had trouble understanding this Q, but I guess I could say my narrative elements came in when...?
3. My best success came when connecting to the audience with my introduction story.

Being Honest with Self
1. Just starting was the most intimidating part for me, but looking at the examples was what helped me the most.
2. I'm not sure which text?
3. The interesting stories or personal anecdotes. That is how I started.
4.I came up with a better conclusion than my original because garret showed me a simple thing to change, which actually impacted the effectiveness of the conclusion.
5. I see myself improving, but still not perfect.

"Nobodiness" (blog10)

Nobodiness is a term that is somewhat difficult to describe. To people that are "somebody", or a person of social status in high school, a nobody would be the "loner" or just the weird kid that always sits by himself. Nobodies are never of any importance to popular kids, but why are they nobodies in the first place?

To an actual "nobody" they may or may not choose to be that nobody. If they choose to do so, they often distance themselves from people, or refrain from making friends, for unknown reasons. A nobody's motives are really their own, but they usually hide themselves for fear of ridicule or a previous scarring experience. When they don't choose to be that nobody they usually just lack the social skills to fit in, often fading into the background, becoming a "nobody"

Tuesdays With Morrie (blog 9)

I know it's cliche, but Tuesdays with more really showed how you shouldn't waste your life running after material things. Just examining mitch's early life shows you can be successful, but not happy. The book made me want to strive to be less materialistic. There were too many life lessons that were overall enlightening, but I really liked their talks about age and our culture.

I WAS a Cripple (Blog 8)

I know I chose the most generic word from the whole essay, but I realized this is very powerful. My sophomore year I broke my collarbone playing football. When I returned to the practices to help Out, I found the word cripple being tossed around a lot when I was nearby. Just the sound of the word cripple made me feel helpless... The saddest part is that I was.

Cripple- a person or animal that is partially or totally unable to use one or more limbs; a lame or disabled person or animal. When I looked up this definition online, it said "sometimes offensive". people don't realize the hurt words can sometimes cause. When I was "crippled" it bothered me when someone had to say that out loud like I didn't realize I was already disabled. But I guess people said it to just tell it like it is. Like in our discussion, sometimes it helps to tell the truth like it is, instead of sugarcoating it. When I was healed fully, I was so relieved. Not only of pain, but of humiliation. I always remember the pain of what it felt like to be called a cripple. So though I try to make things as real as possible, I make sure to handle injured people with care, and to never toss the word cripple around them

Two similar but different things (blog 4)

Football and war. I never thought of it until now but these two events are very alike. Now even though they are totally different there are a few common things they share. Both have winners and losers. Oddly enough both share rules of engagement. In wartime soldiers are given uniforms to represent their factions. The same with football: players are given uniforms to show what team they represent. Lastly, they both engage in fighting. These all may be different kinds of fighting, or different uniforms, but the fact remains that though they are different events, football and war are strangely similar.

Conformity (blog 5)

Nowadays People are always trying to fit in. Teens in high school dress and act certain ways just to fit in. I've even noticed my little brother doing and saying things because "his friend says he should". This "conforming" is just part of human nature. We all want to be part of a bigger picture. But when someone tries to break this pattern they are often socially unaccepted. The box man took this route, and he is painted in a negative light. So technically it is possible to be "non conformed", but it is not accepted. The bible says "And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God." So religiously non conformity is not only accepted, but encouraged. Conformity is just a subject that changes with the ages.